Sunday, March 04, 2007

NFAIS 2007: Measuring Change

Last Sunday, I got to hear Bette Brunelle of Outsell Inc. at the NFAIS 2007 Annual Conference in Philadelphia. Her topic was "Measuring Change: How Disruption Affects to Information Community" - nifty title.

Bette provided us with a bunch of statistics from the Outsell database, but before that, she made a very important point. She mentioned that many of us talk to our current customers to see what they think about our organizations - and to get ideas for change. This is the wrong approach! We should be talking to tomorrow's customers. This model doesn't apply quite as much to academic or public libraries - which I'll come back to later - but most certainly to corporate and other special libraries. For our web redesign project at Jenkins I've asked to interview law and library students to see what they want to see on the website - I want to hear from the future librarians and lawyers so that I can design a site that's going to meet their needs when they graduate.

Before I go into some stats, the disclaimer - in the Outsell database the average user age is 38 and the users are predominately American.

Information Seeking

When asked where users when seeking information for their jobs in both 2001 and 2006 the number one answer (79% in 2001 and 57% in 2006) was the Internet, followed by the office intranet (5% in 2001 and 19% in 2006). The library came in at 3% in 2001 and 4% in 2006 - but we're not surprised since we've seen results like this in many other studies. What's interesting is that when asked how many times these methods resulted in satisfactory answers there was a 31% error rate across all markets (internet, intranet, library) - but when people failed to find info on their intranets they just assumed it was because they didn't search quite right - people apparently are very enthusiastic about their intranets - more so than the internet (yet they're still looking at the internet first for information).

When they fail the users were asked where they go next. 64% will go to an in-house colleague, 18% will go to an out-of-house colleague, and 7% will go to their public library. Sounds about right to me - I work in a library and I still ask my peers for information first.

Email is still king

When asked how people prefer to get their information, 76% still say they want it to come via email. 45% want it to be on their office intranet, 45% want to look to blogs for information (55% of these are under 30 and 43% over 30), 20% choose RSS (23% are under 30, 20% over 30), and 21% get it via podcasts (27% under 30 and 19% over 30).

Remember all of these questions are in reference to work related information seeking/receiving behaviors. Would these numbers change if we were talking about personal information seeking? I know it would for me.

Corporate Libraries

When corporate libraries were asked what technologies they have recently implemented (or plan to in the near future), 40% have said RSS (Great!!), 28% say e-learning, 15% for web conferencing, 9% for blogs (which I find interesting - I would have expected a higher number here), and 7% said e-books.

Here's where it gets disturbing - Bette points out that because corporate libraries are usually dealing with an older population than a public or academic library, it's not where you're going to find the most forward thinking people. When librarians were asked how they went about their daily duties they all gave very traditional methods for doing their jobs.

At this point the slide on the screen was of the New Yorker cartoon where the man is talking to his cat, saying, "Never, ever, think outside the box".

She has my attention now (not that she didn't before - but she's touching on my area of the library world) - and now she's warning the audience to be careful of who you're talking to when you're going to libraries for information. Is this what you expect to hear at an information conference?? It certainly wasn't what I was expecting - but I totally see where she's coming from.

The innovators

That said, if you're looking for innovation and passion in libraries (she says) go to your public library. This is where you're going to find the most passionate staff because they're already dealing with the next generation of library users and they've been forced to keep up with the times. She showed us a few public and academic library sites where innovation was very obvious (tagging, MySpace, Virtual worlds) - and urged us to find out what our future information seekers are going to expect from us.

Thoughts

This was a great talk ... and I'm going back to my library to push that little bit more to instate changes that are going to benefit both our current and our future users - because if we don't start now we're going to be way behind the curve!

Labels:

Code4Lib: Hurry Up Please - It’s Time

Karen Schneider did the first keynote. Sorry it took me so long to write this up, but it was a really great talk and the recording I got was a bit muffled and I wanted to get this right.

Libraries are in a State of Emergency
Karen started by informing us that we're in a State of Emergency in our profession:
  • We have given away our collections
    Allowing third parties to digitize our books (ex Google Books) parties who might not have the same mission as us.

  • We don’t build or own the tools that manage them
    Why aren't ILS built by librarians - the people who know the way libraries work

  • We provide complex, poorly-marketed systems

  • We function like a monopoly service when our competition is thriving right under our nose
Of the above, I don't necessarily agree that we're giving away our content - I think we're using the tools available to us to get the job done - cheap! Why not let Google digitize our books and preserve them? I guess Karen's concern is whether they actually will preserve them - maybe #1 just needs some tweaking of the way we're providing content to others with the necessary tools. Why not hand the books over for scanning and storing by Google, but get copies for ourselves as well. I'm not sure of all of the logistics, but I'm all for using the companies that are out there willing to help us with projects we'd never be able to afford otherwise.

Karen went on to describe our work not as "book" work - but as memory work. We are in charge of preserving access to our society's memories. I got the impression that Karen thinks that we have forgotten our path - and wants to bring us back to it.

She urged us to follow the "5-3-1 Rule":
  • Pick 5 issues you believe are important

  • Focus on 3

  • now, make that 1 happen.
While there are many more things (than 5) that we can fix - Karen suggests these 5 to start with:
  1. digital preservation

  2. standards adoption

  3. the sucky state of most library software

  4. third-party library content hegemony

  5. scholarly awareness of key issues in LibraryLand
Out of that list I'd pick numbers 2 through 5 (are you surprised?). Karen picked number 1, 3 and 5. The one we agree on? Our #1 thing to make happen is number 3!!

Some great things are happening in this area already.
I'd add to that list Koha - which I learned about before Evergreen.

This renaissance of librarian-built software is a powerful thing. It restores the balance of power - the ball's back in our court. It reinstates the direction of our profession - we're now the ones preserving memories and we're doing it our way. Most important (to me) it sends a message to the vendors that we mean business. Who wouldn't want to jump in and help out with this trend (if, of course, they had the knowledge to do so)?

Unfortunately - Karen's message is that nobody cares!
  • Nobody cares about open source
  • Nobody cares about standards
  • Nobody cares about usability
  • Nobody cares about Evergreen
But, don't take this message the wrong way. What Karen is trying to say is that we need to figure out how to sell these things to an audience who might fear the words "open source" or "free". We need to stop talking to those who make the decisions as if they were programmers - or techies - or geeks - like us. We need to sell these things on what they mean for libraries - on what they can do for us.

From here the discussion turned a bit - Karen explained (from a director's point of view) what directors "know" about Open Source Software. In case you didn't catch that - the word know is in quotes - meaning things directors think they know about open source.
  • One guy in a garage… probably in a torn Duran Duran tee-shirt
    • One car accident away from orphan software

  • No support model

  • Cheesy "make-do" quality

  • Arcane and developer-oriented

  • Nobody else is doing it
This is a little funny - and a lot sad. The problem comes down to the fact that we aren't selling OSS right. We're selling it like we'd sell it to people like us. We need to sell it to people who sometimes think that homegrown and OSS are the same thing - people who had to work in libraries that were developing their own cataloging systems - people who apparently had a great sigh of relief when ILS vendors came along and took over the work. What they don't realize is that OSS is not the same as those homegrown products of years ago.

My problem is that I've been doing this very thing. Trying to sell people on Open Source when I should be selling them on the product itself. Karen critiqued open-ils.org, stating that the FAQs are not really frequently asked questions. Instead of answering questions about open source the first question should be "Why should I use this?" - makes sense to me - but then again so did the FAQ page the way it was. It's all a matter of us changing the way we view things and trying to talk to the users - in this case our library directors and staff.

Karen warned us that there is no such thing as free software - not something you want to say in a room full of OSS supporters - but what she says has some merit. The fact is that there is always a chance you're going to have to take your software package home, install it and tweak it to your needs - that's not free - my time is no free. Dan Chudnov made a comment during questions and answers that the word "free" when used in conjunction with OSS really means "freedom" - I really like that idea - and maybe we need to start marketing OSS as freedom - freedom from vendors, from locked down software, from systems that don't meet our needs - freedom to alter the code to fit our own special model.

Karen concluded by stating that every library needs a developer. There was a time when libraries didn't have ILL staff - now it's a requirement. Let's make having developers in our libraries a requirement as well. I'd actually go one step further and require that your developers have library experience. I've worked with outside developers who don't know a thing about libraries - and now we're cleaning up their mess.

View the Powerpoint

Technorati Tags: ,

Labels: ,

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Code4Lib: Breakout 1

I went to the Library APIs Breakout session yesterday. It turned into a talk about Talis & their products & business practices. It was pretty neat ;)

Rob Styles (of Talis) went off on a pretty neat tangent/analogy. Rob introduced us to his 3 children.

His 18 month old son is at a stage in his life where he will willingly give away anything. He goes around the house and finds things to give to others - if you ask for something he will hand it right over. He has no concept of ownership.

His 4 year old daughter is the complete opposite. She feels that everything that's hers is hers alone. She doesn't share and doesn't like other people to touch her things. She has put up a wall around her stuff and stores it away from others.

Lastly, his 7 year old son knows that if he has 2 toy cars and gives one to a friend he can have much more fun than if he keeps it to himself. He understands that while he's letting his friend use his car - it's still his car - it's just more fun when you share with others. At the same time he can go outside and race bikes with his friends - he knows it's a competition, but 5 minutes later he can come inside and play and have fun.

The library vendor world is like the 4 year old. It's an "it's mine" world. Talis feels that it should be a 7 year old world - this is why they share their APIs and software with others. We should be able to share with our competition - because it's no fun if we're playing alone. The models are changing and people are realizing that they can have much more fun if they share. Web 2.0 - Creative Commons - it's all about sharing!!

What a neat idea. I know it doesn't have much to do with the topic at hand (Library APIs), but it was the best part of the breakout (basically because I hadn't used any of the APIs that everyone was talking about).


Technorati Tags: ,

Labels: ,